The other day, I was trawling through the internet for
something interesting (not porn). This was during the long wait for a new
president – oh, by the way, the search for the new Catholic Pope took only two
days. Perhaps there is a lesson therein for the IEBC – and I had gotten tired
of looking at a static TV screen.
Suddenly, I stumbled onto an interesting debate over
whether Jesus Christ was an only child, or if He shared the home He grew up in
with physical siblings.
It is generally assumed by Christian faithful and
taught by the clergy that He was the only child of Joseph, the carpenter and
Mary, the Holy Virgin.
The Holy Bible tells us that He was the product of an
immaculate conception; meaning that there was no physical union between His
mother and a man for Him to have been conceived.
But what does the Bible say about any physical
relations between Mary and her husband Joseph after the birth of Christ? Well, I could not find any reference to that, but I did find mention of possible
siblings in a couple of books.
For example, Matthew
13:54-57 reads:
When
He had come to His own country, He taught them in their synagogue, so that they
were astonished and said, “Where did this Man
get this wisdom and these mighty
works?
Is
this not the carpenter’s son? Is not His mother called Mary? And His brothers
James, Joses, Simon, and Judas?
And
His sisters, are they not all with us? Where then did this Man get all these things?”
So
they were offended at Him. But Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without
honour, except in his own country and in his own house.”
Now, I am no
theologian, but the above words pretty much seem to imply that Jesus did indeed
have blood siblings. There is mention by name of at least four brothers and an
indeterminate number of sisters.
When you put
these verses in context, He was talking to people in a synagogue around where
He grew up. These were people who apparently knew Him when He was younger, and
who knew His family. And they just
could not believe the things that were coming out of His mouth, such knowledge,
such wisdom. This Man that they knew from a kawaida
family!
From my own
understanding, and I could be wrong, what I have referenced above appears to be
an unambiguous pointer to the existence of brothers and sisters who were either
born of Mary after Jesus, or were Joseph’s children from an earlier marriage.
There is no
mention in the Bible of Joseph having been married before he took Mary as his
wife, or of the couple travelling with children when she was heavily pregnant
with Jesus. Neither is there mention of any children when Jesus’ parents were
fleeing with Him to safety, away from King Herod’s murderous thugs.
Therefore, I
think it is entirely possible that these brothers and sisters were born after
Jesus’ own birth, and were the biological children of Mary and her husband
Joseph. There is no evidence in the Bible that Mary remained a “perpetual
virgin”, as some Christians would believe.
Another
reference to siblings can be found in Matthew
12:46-50.
While
He was still talking to the multitudes, behold, His mother and brothers stood
outside, seeking to speak with Him.
Then
one said to Him, “Look, Your mother and Your brothers are standing outside,
seeking to speak with you.”
But
He answered and said to the one who told Him, “Who is My mother and who are My
brothers?”
And
He stretched out His hand toward His disciples and said, “Here are My mother
and My brothers!
“For
whoever does the will of My Father in heaven is My brother and sister and
mother.”
These verses
refer once again to Jesus’ brothers. His physical
brothers. That again, appears to be unambiguous. He talks about his disciples
in an apparent reference to them as His spiritual
family. The distinction is obvious.
There have been
suggestions that in the early languages in which the Bible was first written,
the word brother could have been used
to refer to broad blood relations including cousins, and not necessarily people
born of the same parents. There are hundreds of debates on that, so I cannot
tell for sure.
Many Christians
believe that any reference to family in relation to Jesus can only be about His
spiritual connection to them, and that any suggestion that He might have had
any blood siblings is anathema.
My own feeling
is that as deep as our faith might go, it is important to engage in robust
debate and interrogate some of the beliefs we hold with regard to what the
Bible tells us.
The intention
of this post is not to offer any new insights or positions. Rather, it is meant
to provoke our intellect, thoughts, knowledge and beliefs and not to cause any
offense.
*******************************************************************************************************************
On the same
subject, the Book of John captures Jesus’ final moments before his death on the
cross. John 19:26-27 reads:
When
Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing by, He
said to His mother, “Woman, behold your son!”
Then
He said to the disciple, “Behold your mother!” And from that hour that disciple
took her in his own home.
Now, opponents
of the theory of Jesus and His siblings use these verses to argue that if
indeed He did have brothers, why would He, in His last moments of life, assign
the care of His mother to a non relative instead of any of her existing
children?
I do not know
the answer to that.
My theory
however, is that His brothers might have been too overwhelmed by His sheer
awesomeness that they turned to booze and became irresponsible. There was no
way He was entrusting the care of His mother to them.
Maybe.
*******************************************************************************************************************
My congratulations
to Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires, Argentina, upon his election
as the 266th Pope of the Roman Catholic Church.
Habemus Papam... what, Bean? |
Pope Francis |
I wish Pope
Francis well in the years to come as he leads the Church in a new direction.